Executing all of this synchronously would slow down the customer experience and overload backend services.
To solve this, organizations rely on message brokers and event-driven architectures. These systems enable services to communicate asynchronously, decoupling producers and consumers and allowing workloads to scale independently.
Among the most widely adopted brokers are Kafka, RabbitMQ, SQS, and EventBridge. Each offers unique trade-offs and operational models suited to different needs.
Why Message Brokers Matter
A message broker acts as a durable buffer and routing layer between services. Instead of direct synchronous communication, services publish messages or events that are later processed by one or more consumers. This enables loose coupling, fault tolerance, high throughput, scalability, and event replayability.In E-commerce, this pattern ensures that heavy back-office operations never block the customer's interaction. The user sees "Order Successful" instantly, while dozens of downstream processes continue asynchronously.
Example: Order Placement Workflow The moment an order is placed, the Order Service publishes an event like:
ORDER_PLACED { orderId: "O123", userId: "U55", amount: 2999.0 }
This event flows through a broker and is consumed by:
email service (send confirmation mail),
analytics service (record purchase),
warehouse service (start fulfillment),
fraud detection service (risk scoring),
loyalty service (points calculation),
recommendation engine (update signals).
Message brokers absorb unpredictable spikes—such as during festive sales—ensuring downstream systems aren't overwhelmed.
With context established, let's explore the major message brokers powering this architecture.
Kafka – The Distributed Commit Log for High-Throughput Event Streams
Apache Kafka is designed as a distributed, horizontally scalable, append-only commit log. It is the backbone of many high-throughput, event-driven architectures.Kafka excels in environments where:
millions of events per second must be processed,
consumers need to read streams at their own pace,
replayability and durability are critical,
distributed microservices need real-time pipelines.
In E-commerce, Kafka is typically the central nervous system for:
order lifecycle events,
inventory movement across warehouses,
clickstream analytics,
real-time fraud scoring,
search index updates,
personalization and recommendation modeling.
Kafka's design emphasizes stream processing rather than simple queueing. It is ideal for architectures that treat events as immutable facts that must be replayed or processed in sequence.
RabbitMQ – The Traditional Message Queue for Transactional Workflows
RabbitMQ is a broker built around the AMQP protocol and excels at message delivery semantics like acknowledgments, routing, retries, and dead-letter queues. It supports flexible routing patterns (direct, topic, fanout) and excels at reliable delivery for individual tasks.In E-commerce, RabbitMQ shines in:
email notifications,
order PDF generation,
payment receipt creation,
one-off tasks requiring guaranteed delivery,
workflows that depend on complex routing logic.
While Kafka focuses on streaming and replayability, RabbitMQ focuses on message routing and guaranteed task execution. It's a strong choice when you need immediate worker consumption rather than long-lived streams.
Amazon SQS – A Fully Managed, Serverless Queue
Amazon SQS is a serverless, fully managed queueing service that abstracts away infrastructure. It is known for its simplicity: no cluster to manage, no brokers to tune, no partitions to balance.SQS fits perfectly into E-commerce platforms running on AWS because:
it scales automatically,
it guarantees at-least-once delivery,
costs grow with usage but remain predictable,
it integrates seamlessly with Lambda, EC2, ECS, and SQS-based worker pools.
SQS is ideal for:
asynchronous order tasks,
background catalog updates,
image resizing pipelines,
retry and dead-letter flows,
transactional email offloading.
SQS doesn't provide streaming or replayability like Kafka, but it offers exceptional reliability for discrete message workloads.
Amazon EventBridge – Event Bus for SaaS + Microservice Integrations
EventBridge is an event bus designed for system-level integration rather than raw throughput. Unlike Kafka or RabbitMQ, EventBridge shines when:multiple microservices must react to the same event,
events must be routed automatically based on rules,
integration with AWS services or SaaS platforms (Shopify, Zendesk, Auth0) is needed.
EventBridge is widely used in E-commerce for:
propagating order events across internal and external services,
triggering serverless workflows,
auditing user activity events,
automating back-office operations,
decoupling 3rd-party services (payment gateways, CRM, ERP).
Where Kafka is a high-speed highway, EventBridge is an event router optimized for orchestrating distributed event flows.
Understanding Delivery Guarantees
Message brokers differ in how they deliver messages to consumers. Delivery guarantees determine whether a message might be lost, duplicated, or delivered exactly once.Let's break down the three guarantees:
1. At Least Once Delivery
The broker guarantees that a message will be delivered at least one time, but it may be delivered more than once if retries occur.In other words, no message is lost, but duplicates may appear. This is the most common guarantee across message brokers because it prioritizes durability and reliability.
Why does duplication happen?
- A consumer reads a message but crashes before acknowledging.
- A network partition causes the broker to resend.
- The broker retries because it didn't receive an ACK in time.
Example: If ORDER_PLACED is delivered twice to an analytics service, it may record the order twice unless duplicates are handled. For critical flows (payments, order confirmation), the service must be idempotent.
Almost all brokers deliver at least once by default:
Kafka
RabbitMQ
Amazon SQS
EventBridge
This ensures durability but shifts duplicate handling to the consumer.
2. Exactly Once Delivery (Kafka Streams)
A message is processed once and only once, without duplication and without loss. This is extremely hard in distributed systems because:- Networks fail
- Consumers crash
- Retries cause duplicates
- Side effects cannot always be rolled back
Kafka achieves exactly-once semantics (EOS) only under specific controlled conditions:
- Using Kafka Streams or Kafka transactions
- Writing to Kafka topics (not external DBs)
- Atomic read-process-write cycles
Kafka's EOS works because:
- Offsets, state, and outputs are committed transactionally
- Kafka controls the entire pipeline end-to-end
Example: A fraud detection service processing clickstream events must not process the same event twice or risk false alerts. Kafka Streams provides this by maintaining coordinated state stores.
Important: No distributed system offers "global" exactly-once across all external systems. I's exactly-once within Kafka.
3. Exactly Once (RabbitMQ with Plugins)
RabbitMQ supports exactly-once delivery only through:- Specialized plugins
- Careful storage configuration
- Transactional semantics
But in practice, RabbitMQ's default is at least once, and achieving EOS is tricky due to:
- Message acknowledgment timing
- Consumer/producer crashes
- Side-effect handling in downstream systems
Most teams use idempotency at the consumer layer rather than relying on RabbitMQ's EOS.
4. FIFO & Strict Ordering (SQS FIFO)
Amazon SQS FIFO queues guarantee:- Exactly-once processing (per message group)
- Strict ordering within each group
This works because AWS:
- Deduplicates based on message IDs
- Ensures messages of the same group are delivered sequentially
- This is ideal for workloads needing strict sequence processing.
AWS SQS FIFO prevents duplicate messages by using a MessageDeduplicationId (or a hash of the message body). If the same ID appears again within a short window, SQS drops the duplicate instead of enqueueing it. This ensures producers don’t accidentally send the same message twice during retries.
Example: Consider updating a product's inventory count:
+5 restock
-2 order placed
-1 return processed
The order must remain consistent. SQS FIFO ensures these operations are executed in the right order without duplication.
| Guarantee | Meaning | Useful For |
|---|---|---|
| At least once | No message lost, duplicates possible | Most business events (orders, emails, analytics) |
| Exactly once | No duplicates, no loss | High-integrity pipelines, fraud detection, financial pipelines |
| FIFO ordering | Correct sequence processing | Inventory updates, ledgers, transactional workflows |
Conclusion
Message brokers are not interchangeable—they reflect architectural intent.| Feature / Aspect | Kafka | RabbitMQ | SQS | EventBridge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Distributed log & streaming platform | Message queue & routing broker (AMQP) | Fully managed distributed queue | Serverless event bus & router |
| Message Model | Streams, partitions, consumer groups | Queues, exchanges, routing keys, bindings | Queues (standard & FIFO) | Event bus with rule-based routing |
| Delivery Guarantee | At least once; exactly once (with Kafka Streams) | At least once (default), exactly once with plugins | At least once; FIFO for strict ordering | At least once |
| Ordering | Strong ordering within a partition | Optional ordering; not guaranteed globally | FIFO queues preserve strict order | No strict ordering guarantees |
| Scalability | Horizontal, extremely high throughput (millions/sec) | Scales but not built for extreme streaming loads | Automatically elastic | Automatically elastic across regions |
| Replayability | Yes — consumers can re-read from any offset | Limited — messages removed on ack | No replay — once processed, removed | No replay — event-driven only |
| Latency | Very low | Low to moderate | Low | Low to moderate (rule-based processing) |
| Durability | Distributed log persisted across brokers | Durable queues with persistence | Fully durable, managed by AWS | Fully durable events persisted internally |
| Protocols | Custom TCP protocol | AMQP, MQTT, STOMP | AWS API | AWS API |
| Operational Overhead | High — cluster ops, partitioning, brokers | Medium — tuning queues, exchanges | Very low — serverless | Very low — serverless |
| Consumption Style | Pull-based consumers | Push-based consumers | Pull-based | Push to targets (Lambda, Step Functions, etc.) |
| Ideal For | Streaming, analytics, event sourcing, real-time pipelines | Task distribution, workflows, guaranteed execution | Background jobs, batching, async processing | SaaS integration, multi-service orchestration, automated routing |
| Primary Strength | High-throughput distributed streaming + replay | Flexible routing & reliable delivery | Zero-maintenance queueing | Event-driven integrations at ecosystem scale |
| Primary Limitation | Operational complexity | Not suited for huge event streams | No replayability | Not a data streaming platform |
| Best E-commerce Use Cases | Clickstream ingestion, inventory movement streams, fraud pipelines, recommendation signals | Email notifications, transactional tasks, PDF generation, workflow orchestration | Image processing pipelines, catalog updates, retry queues, slow tasks | Payment reconciliation events, CRM/ERP updates, cross-service order events, audit trails |